POKIQ

culture

Five hands we could check.

Famous hands are retold more often than they are looked up, and every retelling is a chance for a suit to move or a bet size to grow. So this page carries five of them rather than fifteen, each with the source that prints the cards, and it says out loud where two sources disagree.

the hands

Johnny Chan against Erik Seidel

1988

World Series of Poker Main Event, final hand

Chan, both sources agree on these

the board as Card Player prints it

Chan limped with jack nine and flopped the nut straight on queen ten eight. Seidel raised the flop with queen seven, both players checked the turn, and Seidel moved all in on the river into a hand that could not lose. Chan called and took his second title in a row. Wikipedia and Card Player print different suits for Seidel, so his cards are named here without them.

Chris Ferguson against T. J. Cloutier

2000

World Series of Poker Main Event, final hand

Ferguson, calling all in

flop, turn, river

Cloutier moved in with ace queen and Ferguson tanked for several minutes before calling with ace nine, which was a large underdog. The board paired kings and then dealt a nine on the river. Ferguson won a field of 512 players and 1.5 million dollars, and the two sources we read give different suits for Cloutier, so his hand is named without them.

Chris Moneymaker against Sam Farha

2003

World Series of Poker Main Event, heads up

Moneymaker, king high, no pair

flop, turn, river

Blinds were 20,000 and 40,000. Moneymaker raised to 100,000 with king seven and Farha called with queen nine. Both checked a flop that gave Farha top pair. On the turn Farha bet 300,000 into 210,000 and Moneymaker raised to 800,000 with a straight and a flush draw, both of which missed. Farha checked the river and Moneymaker moved all in with king high. Farha folded a pair of nines.

Doyle Brunson against Jesse Alto

1976

World Series of Poker Main Event, final hand

Brunson, the hand now named after him

Alto held ace jack and had much the better of it when the money went in on a flop of an ace, a jack and a ten. A deuce fell on the turn and a ten on the river, giving Brunson a full house and the title with 220,000 dollars. He won again the next year with the same two cards, which is why ten deuce carries his name. Our source gives the board by rank only, so no suits are shown here.

Gus Hansen against Daniel Negreanu

Televised cash game

High Stakes Poker

Hansen, the smaller pair

flop, turn, river

Negreanu flopped a set of sixes and Hansen flopped a set of fives, which is the worst possible way to be behind. The turn gave Hansen the fourth five and the hand was over before either player could get away from it. The pot was 575,700 dollars. It is the standard example of a cooler: nobody misplayed anything.

the hand that is a story rather than a hand

Jack Straus won the 1982 Main Event after being reduced to a single chip, and the phrase a chip and a chair comes from it. That much is solid. Almost everything else about the story is softer than its retellings imply: Wikipedia states plainly that accounts vary, and that the moment happened early on the second day rather than at the final table where people tend to place it.

We keep it here because the correction is the interesting part. The lesson survives the uncertainty in a tournament, where being short is a position rather than a verdict, and that is worked out properly in the lesson on tournament play and in the page on multi table tournaments.

what these hands do not teach

Four of the five hands above are famous for the card that came last. Brunson made a full house on the river twice, Ferguson caught a nine, Hansen hit the case five. Those are the moments that get replayed, and they are the exact part of poker that no player controls. The glossary calls the version of it that hurts a bad beat, and the reason it feels personal is covered under variance.

The one hand on this page that is genuinely about a decision is the 2003 bluff, and it is instructive for an unglamorous reason: Moneymaker had a straight draw and a flush draw when he raised the turn, so the bet had two ways to win before the bluff ever had to work on its own. That is what a semi bluff is, and it is the difference between the hand and the highlight reel.

next step

One hand a day, judged before the river falls.

The daily hand gives you a real situation and asks what you would do, then shows what the numbers say. It is the opposite exercise to reading a famous hand: no outcome to be impressed by, only the decision. Free, no account.

questions

What is the most famous hand in poker?

The bluff Chris Moneymaker made against Sam Farha in the 2003 World Series of Poker Main Event is the one most often named, because it was televised, because it worked with king high, and because the man who made it had qualified online for a small entry fee and went on to win.

Why are there only five hands on this page?

Because these are the five we could read at a source that prints the cards and the board. Famous hands attract retellings, and retellings quietly change a suit or a bet size. A hand we could not check does more harm on the page than it does missing from it.

Why do some hands here have no board?

Because the source gives the ranks and not the suits. Rather than pick suits that make a nice picture, we print what the source prints and say so.

What is the ten deuce hand?

Doyle Brunson won the World Series Main Event in 1976 and again in 1977 with a ten and a deuce, in both cases making a full house on the river. The hand is named after him because of those two finishes and not because it is worth playing.

Did Jack Straus really win from one chip?

He won the 1982 Main Event after being down to a single chip, and the details beyond that are less certain than the story suggests. Wikipedia notes that accounts vary and that the moment happened early on the second day rather than at the final table, which is where popular retellings tend to put it.

Does knowing these hands make you better at poker?

No. A famous hand is famous because of what happened after the money went in, which is the part nobody controls. What is worth studying is the decision before that, and the same hands read very differently when you look at them that way.

sources

Every card, board, amount and field size on this page comes from one of these, read on 30 August 2026. Hands we could only find in summaries we could not verify are not here at all.

Back to poker culture, or read how the same discipline applies to money in the page on the biggest pots.

First import free, no payment details.

Start free